Summary of Recommendations

Summary of Recommendations from the Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (2009).

Table 1. Modified HICPAC Categorization Scheme* for Recommendations

Rank Description Category IA

A strong recommendation supported by high to moderate quality evidence suggesting net clinical benefits or harms. (Please refer to Methods for process used to grade quality of evidence)

Category IB

A strong recommendation supported by low quality evidence suggesting net clinical benefits or harms or an accepted practice (e.g., aseptic technique) supported by low to very low quality evidence.

Category IC A strong recommendation required by state or federal regulation. Category II

A weak recommendation supported by any quality evidence suggesting a trade off between clinical benefits and harms.

No recommendation/
unresolved issue

Unresolved issue for which there is low to very low quality evidence with uncertain trade offs between benefits and harms.

* Please refer to Methods for implications of Category designations.

I. Appropriate Urinary Catheter Use

Recommendations for Appropriate urinary catheter use by ID number and category.
# Recommendation Category
I.A. Insert catheters only for appropriate indications (see Table 2 for guidance), and leave in place only as long as needed. IB
I.A.1. Minimize urinary catheter use and duration of use in all patients, particularly those at higher risk for CAUTI or mortality from catheterization such as women, the elderly, and patients with impaired immunity. IB
I.A.2. Avoid use of urinary catheters in patients and nursing home residents for management of incontinence. IB
I.A.2.a. Further research is needed on periodic (e.g., nighttime) use of external catheters (e.g., condom catheters) in incontinent patients or residents and the use of catheters to prevent skin breakdown. No recommendation/ unresolved issue
I.A.3. Use urinary catheters in operative patients only as necessary, rather than routinely. IB
I.A.4. For operative patients who have an indication for an indwelling catheter, remove the catheter as soon as possible postoperatively, preferably within 24 hours, unless there are appropriate indications for continued use. IB

I.B. Consider using alternatives to indwelling urethral catheterization in selected patients when appropriate.

Recommendations for Consider using alternatives by ID number and category.
# Recommendation Category
I.B.1. Consider using external catheters as an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters in cooperative male patients without urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction. II
I.B.2. Consider alternatives to chronic indwelling catheters, such as intermittent catheterization, in spinal cord injury patients. II
I.B.3. Intermittent catheterization is preferable to indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheters in patients with bladder emptying dysfunction. II
I.B.4. Consider intermittent catheterization in children with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bladder to reduce the risk of urinary tract deterioration. II
I.B.5. Further research is needed on the benefit of using a urethral stent as an alternative to an indwelling catheter in selected patients with bladder outlet obstruction. No recommendation/ unresolved issue
I.B.6. Further research is needed on the risks and benefits of suprapubic catheters as an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters in selected patients requiring short- or long-term catheterization, particularly with respect to complications related to catheter insertion or the catheter site. No recommendation/ unresolved issue

Table 2.

A. Examples of Appropriate Indications for Indwelling Urethral Catheter Use 1-4